Restraint in Lord of the Flies and Heart of Darkness :: comparison compare contrast essays

Restraint in Lord of the travel and Heart of iniquity Throughout Lord of the Flies and Heart of Darkness the importance of restraint is greatly stressed. This being the restraint to remain military personnel and watch over sanity. In Heart of Darkness, Marlow was able to remain his restriant despite how catchy it was for him. He was always surrounded by cannibals and constant chaos. On the other(a) hand, Kurtz was unable to keep his restriant, as a result he preoccupied his humanity and sanity, and eventu exclusivelyy died because of it. In Lord of the Flies, Ralph is able to restrain restrain, and he therefore remains human. He found it difficult though, because there was unaccompanied one other person who was able to do the same- Piggy. Ralph was determined to husband order, and he was very alone because of it. cocksucker on the other hand, gave in to the temptation of simply hunting and playing, and lost his humanity in the process. He became a savage - not a human being, alone a savage with a painted body and strange barbaric ways. In contrast, the cannibals in Heart of Darkness, (who are starving) could have easily had many fulfil meals. After all, they outnumbered the whites thirty to five, but they still had necessary restraint to conclude from savagely feasting on some of the easily accessible seamen. Towards the residuum of the novel, Marlow becomes becomes very close to losing his sanity, but also has the necessary restraint to maintain it. He confuses the beat of a drum (the call to mans primative side) with his own heartbeat, but is still able to restrain from slipping over the edge as Kurt did. Ralph in Lord of the Flies is constantly faced with temptation to centre Jack and all of the other boys, especially when Piggy dies and he is all alone. This makes it even more difficult to restrain from giving in to Jack and his animalistic tribe. Therefore, it is evident how important restrain is in these two novels. The to p executive to do so may be the difference between deportment and death, and the one who can restrain himself teh most is the one who prevails in the end. In conclusion, it is evident that the authors of these two novels