Genetically modified organism Essay

genetically modifying provenders might seem very unorthodox with the changing of traits and genes in spite of appearance the foods, but genetically modifying foods does non hurt the consumer in any way. in the first place in the 1990s, genetically modified foods were announced by the solid food and drug Administration to non be inherently dangerous. However, when a type of transgenic corn was pulled from the market when it was mistakenly entered into the open food supply in 2000 that was non fit for human consumption, it led to growing concerns of the preventativety of down genetically modified foods.These foods be not only sound, but transformative. awkward biotechnology has littleened the amount of chemical pesticides and herbicides used in these foods. This apprehension has been making important contributions to the relief of world hunger, genetically modified foods atomic number 18 obviously impregnable to consume. genetically modified foods atomic number 18 em phatically safe and nutritious because if the consumption of genetically modified foods posed a wellness threat, we would have known it by now. The biotechnology within the foods has made it assertable to have a safe consumption.Genetically modified foods have never been proven to be injureful to humans. Genetically modified (GM) food has bewilder so common in the U. S. that most people do not even know when they are consuming it (Update Genetically special pabulum, 2008). If the foods were harmful, people would be getting sick all the while since most of the time we presumet even know that we are consuming it. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) declared that GM foods were not inherently dangerous (ProQuest Staff, At Issue Genetically Modified Foods, 2013).The FDA is a huge association that regu moderns the purity and safety of foods, drugs, and cosmetics. If they say that the GM foods are safe, then they are definitely safe. Genetically modified foods are safe for the e nvironment. Most GM crops have been modified to be either herbicide- or insect-resistantbecause the plants themselves are poisonous to insects, farmers do not need to spray their crops with pesticides, which harm the environment. Biotechnicians also say modifications like those lead to more efficient domain and, in turn, resultin higher crop yields (Update Genetically Modified Food, 2008). Since farmers do not need to spray their crops with pesticides, they dont damage the earth, making genetically modified foods safe. By procreation the oil content of other plants non-petroleum, organic lubri tailts can be harvested, trim dependence on fossil fuel (Modified Food whitethorn Enrich Our Health, 1999). Less fossil fuel forget be produced, making the genetically modified foods safe for the earth. Not everyone is for genetically modifying foods, though. gibe to the article, Genetically Modified Food Should Be Banned, products of the biotech industry cannot be considered safe because there has only been one human health contract published in 2004 called The Newcastle Study (Andy Rees, Genetically Modified Food Should Be Banned, 2003). Having only one published story of the health set up of genetically modified foods is a legitimate reason to want to forbiddance the cultivation of the GM crops, but from a scientific perspective, there rattling should not be a concern of GM foods being more harmful compared to the non GM foods.Genetically modified have no scientific evidence of not being safe. GM crops can contribute to a great time to come for all people, but if the cultivation of GM crops were to be banned, no explore could be done to find the positives and negatives of GM crops. harmonise to the article, Genetically Modified Food Should Not be Banned, but guardedly Monitored, some crops that are genetically modified to be resistant to maybe herbicide or pests are exposed to a lot less of the chemical contaminations than most of the foods we eat are (Co nor Meade, Genetically Modified Food Should Not be Banned, but metrically Monitored, 2003).So, it is realistic that GM food is not bad for us at all. And although GM crops are not the solution for the sicknesses of the world, if the technology is handled by everywheretly funded institutions, they can find possible ways to modify the foods to create a much greater future for the people unable to consume them. Genetically modified foods are definitely safe and nutritious because if the consumption of genetically modified foods posed a health threat, we would have known it by now.Because of the incapability to prove that GM foods are definitely neither safe nor unsafe, the issue will rest controversial. People will always be uncertain about conducting explore of the topic because of that, but if it remains like this, foods will not be able to be modified to help the health of others by creating allergy-resistant products, and we will never be able to find any more nurture about the GM crops making them always remain a health risk mystery. In addition, GM crops could be very beneficial and force a great future for all people.But without careful and familiar study and research, proper decisions about the cultivation and use of GM crops can never be made. Research on GM crops by public institutions is absolutely necessary in order to find more instruction about the issue. Without this research, a ban on GM crops is definitely not the best idea. Since genetically modified foods have been on market shelves for over twenty years and there has been no proof that they hurt anyone, it is safe to assume that no one will have a late health consequence from digesting a GM food they had over a decade ago.Instead of banning the research and cultivation of the GM foods, research should be accepted to be searched about the topic because eventually the GM food industry could do wonders. Works Cited Meade, Conor. Genetically Modified Food Should Not Be Banned, but Carefu lly Monitored. Genetically Engineered Foods. Ed. Nancy Harris. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 2003. At Issue. Rpt. from Careful Stewardship of GM Crops Is Needed, Not a Ban. Irish Times 23 June 2007 13. fence Viewpoints In Context. Web. Rees, Andy. Genetically Modified Food Should Be Banned. Genetically Engineered Foods.Ed. Nancy Harris. San Diego Greenhaven Press, 2003. At Issue. Rpt. from GM PotatoesFacts and Fictions. The Ecologist 36. 9 (22 Sept. 2006) 14-15. Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. ProQuest Staff. At Issue Genetically Modified Foods. ProQuest LLC. 2013 n. pag. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. Update Genetically Modified Food. Issues & Controversies On File n. pag. Issues & Controversies. Facts On File News Services, 31 Dec. 2008. Web. Modified Foods May Enrich Our Health. Vancouver solarize (Vancouver, Canada). 20 Dec 1999 A12. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web.