'Celia, a Slave Book Review Essay\r'

'Celia, A Slave is a tarradiddle that takes m any(prenominal) another(prenominal) different historical facts from the era that the give was located in, and uses a hard worker named Celia’s story to haulage them all in and show how these events that didn’t comparable a shot yarn-dye her, would indirectly affect her, and the other slaves in this time as well.\r\nThe author, Melton A. McLaurin, not only wrote the story of Celia in his book, but he also rivet on other historical events taking spot at the time to support his thesis that Celia’s lineament demonstrated what was happening on a global scale. He used facts such as the slave revolts in Haiti and the Dred Scott finality to make a case on why occasions were so to a great extent for slaves at the time in the United States, and how they touch Celia, and her case. McLaurin also used different people and organizations like the Border Ruffians and the Massachusetts Emigrant tutelage party to show the grow and society of the time and holding of Celia’s story.\r\nThe slave revolts in Haiti would indirectly affect Celia. Because the slaves revolted in Haiti, and actually won, it came as a wakeup withdraw to the southerners. They knew that the slave population outnumbered their own, and if they revolted against them, they weren’t sure if they would be able to stop them. This do the Southerners even stricter when it came to thraldom, and less(prenominal) lenient when it came to any types of escapes, or breaking of laws. This made it impossible for the jury in Celia’s score case to believe that it she truly violent deathed him in self-defense.\r\nThe Dred Scott decision would directly affect her, because of the fact that the decision was alleviate valid, and she, along with all the other slaves, weren’t protect by the U.S. Constitution, and were not considered U.S. citizens. This ruled out any argument that John Jameson, and the rest of her def ense, would come up with arguing her constitutional rights. Instead, they brought up things like, how it would’ve been possible for her to kill a man of his size, and how it was possible that the body would’ve been exclusively disseminated in a fire in a matter of hours. Thomas Shoatman also tried to bear witness that after she striked Newsom the first time â€Å"he threw his establish up to catch her”, but the umpire keep up prosecution objections to the defendants testimonies, because a majority of the jury and the judge himself were all slave owners. This even came as a problem for John Jameson at first, because he was fend for a slave when he had some himself. The thing that really allowed him to relate to Celia though, was the fact that he had a daughter, and he wouldn’t have wanted the same(p) injustice fall on her if the roles were reversed.\r\nThe Border Ruffians showed the culture and society of the time in Missouri. The border ruffians wou ld regulate over into Kansas and vote for all things pro slavery related, and would beat Kansas citizens into voting for pro slavery as well. This was an example of the people that resided in Missouri, and how intent they were on making slavery legal in as many states as possible.\r\nThe Massachusetts Emigrant Aid Company also showed the culture of the time, but from the flavor of people who didn’t want slavery. The company took return of the Kansas Nebraska Act to try and get anti-slavery supporters to square off in the Kansas territory, to try and make it a slave free state. The company was crucial in subsiding Kansas, and making it a free slave state.\r\nThe book was a good read, though a fight repetitive at times, and educated the reader virtually different issues at the time of Celia’s case that would affect her, and also affected slaves racys in at the time. It also would educate the reader to what it was like to live in the time of Celia’s case, a nd get an incursion on what it was like for her, and others.\r\n'